]> git.kernelconcepts.de Git - karo-tx-linux.git/commitdiff
bpf: add various test cases to verifier selftests
authorDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:39:32 +0000 (01:39 +0200)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fri, 28 Apr 2017 19:48:14 +0000 (15:48 -0400)
Add several test cases around ldimm64, fp arithmetic and direct
packet access.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c

index 95a8d5f3ab80d9c3dd65e35dea74fab558adb21d..d3395c192a249684f9d40858fa5b0e745f924a9f 100644 (file)
@@ -190,6 +190,86 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
                .errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
                .result = REJECT,
        },
+       {
+               "test6 ld_imm64",
+               .insns = {
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 0),
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+               },
+               .result = ACCEPT,
+       },
+       {
+               "test7 ld_imm64",
+               .insns = {
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+               },
+               .result = ACCEPT,
+       },
+       {
+               "test8 ld_imm64",
+               .insns = {
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 1, 1),
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+               },
+               .errstr = "uses reserved fields",
+               .result = REJECT,
+       },
+       {
+               "test9 ld_imm64",
+               .insns = {
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 1, 1),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+               },
+               .errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
+               .result = REJECT,
+       },
+       {
+               "test10 ld_imm64",
+               .insns = {
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0, 1),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+               },
+               .errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
+               .result = REJECT,
+       },
+       {
+               "test11 ld_imm64",
+               .insns = {
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+               },
+               .errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
+               .result = REJECT,
+       },
+       {
+               "test12 ld_imm64",
+               .insns = {
+                       BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+               },
+               .errstr = "not pointing to valid bpf_map",
+               .result = REJECT,
+       },
+       {
+               "test13 ld_imm64",
+               .insns = {
+                       BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+                       BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+               },
+               .errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
+               .result = REJECT,
+       },
        {
                "no bpf_exit",
                .insns = {
@@ -330,6 +410,30 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
                .errstr = "invalid read from stack",
                .result = REJECT,
        },
+       {
+               "invalid fp arithmetic",
+               /* If this gets ever changed, make sure JITs can deal with it. */
+               .insns = {
+                       BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+                       BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+                       BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 8),
+                       BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+               },
+               .errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic",
+               .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+               .errstr = "R1 invalid mem access",
+               .result = REJECT,
+       },
+       {
+               "non-invalid fp arithmetic",
+               .insns = {
+                       BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+                       BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+               },
+               .result = ACCEPT,
+       },
        {
                "invalid argument register",
                .insns = {
@@ -1800,6 +1904,20 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
                .result_unpriv = REJECT,
                .result = ACCEPT,
        },
+       {
+               "unpriv: adding of fp",
+               .insns = {
+                       BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+                       BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+                       BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+                       BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+               },
+               .errstr_unpriv = "pointer arithmetic prohibited",
+               .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+               .errstr = "R1 invalid mem access",
+               .result = REJECT,
+       },
        {
                "unpriv: cmp of stack pointer",
                .insns = {
@@ -2471,6 +2589,25 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
                .result = REJECT,
                .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
        },
+       {
+               "direct packet access: test16 (arith on data_end)",
+               .insns = {
+                       BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+                                   offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+                       BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+                                   offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+                       BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+                       BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+                       BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 16),
+                       BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+                       BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+                       BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+               },
+               .errstr = "invalid access to packet",
+               .result = REJECT,
+               .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+       },
        {
                "helper access to packet: test1, valid packet_ptr range",
                .insns = {