USB: EHCI: fix two new bugs related to Clear-TT-Buffer

This patch (as1273) fixes two(!) bugs introduced by the new
Clear-TT-Buffer implementation in ehci-hcd.

	It is now possible for an idle QH to have some URBs on its
	queue -- this will happen if a Clear-TT-Buffer is pending for
	the QH's endpoint.  Consequently we should not issue a warning
	when someone tries to unlink an URB from an idle QH; instead
	we should process the request immediately.

	The refcounts for QHs could get messed up, because
	submit_async() would increment the refcount when calling
	qh_link_async() and qh_link_async() would then refuse to link
	the QH into the schedule if a Clear-TT-Buffer was pending.
	Instead we should increment the refcount only when the QH
	actually is added to the schedule.  The current code tries to
	be clever by leaving the refcount alone if an unlink is
	immediately followed by a relink; the patch changes this to an
	unconditional decrement and increment (although they occur in
	the opposite order).

Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
CC: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Tested-by: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
index 7d03549c3339ecc5ebdc5025db1d9f3b6d42f148..11c627ce60224754978bf495e40cd94496c3b7c7 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
@@ -903,7 +903,8 @@ static int ehci_urb_dequeue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, int status)
                        /* already started */
                        break;
                case QH_STATE_IDLE:
-                       WARN_ON(1);
+                       /* QH might be waiting for a Clear-TT-Buffer */
+                       qh_completions(ehci, qh);
                        break;
                }
                break;

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
index 9a1384747f3bc8ca092b226d6de8fed5d6850276..b27380505576d9489e6aff7cd426a9fd64f176b5 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
@@ -940,6 +940,7 @@ static void qh_link_async (struct ehci_hcd *ehci, struct ehci_qh *qh)
        head->qh_next.qh = qh;
        head->hw_next = dma;
 
+       qh_get(qh);
        qh->xacterrs = QH_XACTERR_MAX;
        qh->qh_state = QH_STATE_LINKED;
        /* qtd completions reported later by interrupt */
@@ -1080,7 +1081,7 @@ submit_async (
         * the HC and TT handle it when the TT has a buffer ready.
         */
        if (likely (qh->qh_state == QH_STATE_IDLE))
-               qh_link_async (ehci, qh_get (qh));
+               qh_link_async(ehci, qh);
  done:
        spin_unlock_irqrestore (&ehci->lock, flags);
        if (unlikely (qh == NULL))
@@ -1115,8 +1116,6 @@ static void end_unlink_async (struct ehci_hcd *ehci)
                        && HC_IS_RUNNING (ehci_to_hcd(ehci)->state))
                qh_link_async (ehci, qh);
        else {
-               qh_put (qh);            // refcount from async list
-
                /* it's not free to turn the async schedule on/off; leave it
                 * active but idle for a while once it empties.
                 */
@@ -1124,6 +1123,7 @@ static void end_unlink_async (struct ehci_hcd *ehci)
                                && ehci->async->qh_next.qh == NULL)
                        timer_action (ehci, TIMER_ASYNC_OFF);
        }
+       qh_put(qh);                     /* refcount from async list */
 
        if (next) {
                ehci->reclaim = NULL;