From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 22:24:32 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: userfaultfd: replace ENOSPC with ESRCH in case mm has gone during copy/zeropage
X-Git-Tag: v4.13-rc5~18^2
X-Git-Url: https://git.kernelconcepts.de/?p=karo-tx-linux.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=e86b298bebf7e799e4b7232e9135799f1947552e;ds=sidebyside

userfaultfd: replace ENOSPC with ESRCH in case mm has gone during copy/zeropage

When the process exit races with outstanding mcopy_atomic, it would be
better to return ESRCH error.  When such race occurs the process and
it's mm are going away and returning "no such process" to the uffd
monitor seems better fit than ENOSPC.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1502111545-32305-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---

diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index 06ea26b8c996..b0d5897bc4e6 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1600,7 +1600,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_copy(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
 				   uffdio_copy.len);
 		mmput(ctx->mm);
 	} else {
-		return -ENOSPC;
+		return -ESRCH;
 	}
 	if (unlikely(put_user(ret, &user_uffdio_copy->copy)))
 		return -EFAULT;
@@ -1647,7 +1647,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
 				     uffdio_zeropage.range.len);
 		mmput(ctx->mm);
 	} else {
-		return -ENOSPC;
+		return -ESRCH;
 	}
 	if (unlikely(put_user(ret, &user_uffdio_zeropage->zeropage)))
 		return -EFAULT;