The kbuild test robot complained that we got the printk format wrong.
Let's just kill these printks instead of fixing them as there is not
point after the initial tree algorithm debugging.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
struct pnfs_block_extent *new;
sector_t orig_len = be->be_length;
struct pnfs_block_extent *new;
sector_t orig_len = be->be_length;
- dprintk("%s: need split for 0x%lx:0x%lx at 0x%lx\n",
- __func__, be->be_f_offset, ext_f_end(be), split);
-
new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!new)
return -ENOMEM;
new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!new)
return -ENOMEM;
new->be_tag = be->be_tag;
new->be_device = nfs4_get_deviceid(be->be_device);
new->be_tag = be->be_tag;
new->be_device = nfs4_get_deviceid(be->be_device);
- dprintk("%s: got 0x%lx:0x%lx!\n",
- __func__, be->be_f_offset, ext_f_end(be));
- dprintk("%s: got 0x%lx:0x%lx!\n",
- __func__, new->be_f_offset, ext_f_end(new));
-
__ext_tree_insert(root, new, false);
return 0;
}
__ext_tree_insert(root, new, false);
return 0;
}