From a3df99b50f759794df9ee13f3a371954eb6b761b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fabio Estevam Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 16:13:29 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] mx6: soc: Do not apply the PFD erratum for mx6solox The PFD issue is not present on mx6solox, so skip it in this case. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c index 2012caf2e7..f2dee76941 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c @@ -337,6 +337,10 @@ void s_init(void) u32 mask480; u32 mask528; + + if (is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6SX)) + return; + /* Due to hardware limitation, on MX6Q we need to gate/ungate all PFDs * to make sure PFD is working right, otherwise, PFDs may * not output clock after reset, MX6DL and MX6SL have added 396M pfd -- 2.39.2