]> git.kernelconcepts.de Git - karo-tx-linux.git/commitdiff
watchdog: don't run proc_watchdog_update if new value is same as old
authorJoshua Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
Thu, 17 Mar 2016 21:17:23 +0000 (14:17 -0700)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:08:54 +0000 (09:08 -0700)
commit a1ee1932aa6bea0bb074f5e3ced112664e4637ed upstream.

While working on a script to restore all sysctl params before a series of
tests I found that writing any value into the
/proc/sys/kernel/{nmi_watchdog,soft_watchdog,watchdog,watchdog_thresh}
causes them to call proc_watchdog_update().

  NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs, permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.
  NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs, permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.
  NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs, permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.
  NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs, permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.

There doesn't appear to be a reason for doing this work every time a write
occurs, so only do it when the values change.

Signed-off-by: Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
kernel/watchdog.c

index 18f34cf75f741e2a63db6dc6c522dfa2e03d1a54..198137b1cadc6a8438cf105270c0229ccc4149e5 100644 (file)
@@ -907,6 +907,9 @@ static int proc_watchdog_common(int which, struct ctl_table *table, int write,
                 * both lockup detectors are disabled if proc_watchdog_update()
                 * returns an error.
                 */
+               if (old == new)
+                       goto out;
+
                err = proc_watchdog_update();
        }
 out:
@@ -951,7 +954,7 @@ int proc_soft_watchdog(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 int proc_watchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
                         void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
 {
-       int err, old;
+       int err, old, new;
 
        get_online_cpus();
        mutex_lock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
@@ -971,6 +974,10 @@ int proc_watchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
        /*
         * Update the sample period. Restore on failure.
         */
+       new = ACCESS_ONCE(watchdog_thresh);
+       if (old == new)
+               goto out;
+
        set_sample_period();
        err = proc_watchdog_update();
        if (err) {