]> git.kernelconcepts.de Git - karo-tx-linux.git/blobdiff - drivers/md/dm-raid.c
dm raid: round region_size to power of two
[karo-tx-linux.git] / drivers / md / dm-raid.c
index 10635e965fecfe3d6ea1b736e2310efe8b5f890f..4a20bf8c72da66f81572c6bb65102e994eb4c8e4 100644 (file)
@@ -295,9 +295,11 @@ static int validate_region_size(struct raid_set *rs, unsigned long region_size)
                 * Choose a reasonable default.  All figures in sectors.
                 */
                if (min_region_size > (1 << 13)) {
+                       /* If not a power of 2, make it the next power of 2 */
+                       if (min_region_size & (min_region_size - 1))
+                               region_size = 1 << fls(region_size);
                        DMINFO("Choosing default region size of %lu sectors",
                               region_size);
-                       region_size = min_region_size;
                } else {
                        DMINFO("Choosing default region size of 4MiB");
                        region_size = 1 << 13; /* sectors */
@@ -349,6 +351,7 @@ static int validate_region_size(struct raid_set *rs, unsigned long region_size)
 static int validate_rebuild_devices(struct raid_set *rs)
 {
        unsigned i, rebuild_cnt = 0;
+       unsigned rebuilds_per_group, copies, d;
 
        if (!(rs->print_flags & DMPF_REBUILD))
                return 0;
@@ -369,6 +372,37 @@ static int validate_rebuild_devices(struct raid_set *rs)
                        goto too_many;
                break;
        case 10:
+               copies = raid10_md_layout_to_copies(rs->md.layout);
+               if (rebuild_cnt < copies)
+                       break;
+
+               /*
+                * It is possible to have a higher rebuild count for RAID10,
+                * as long as the failed devices occur in different mirror
+                * groups (i.e. different stripes).
+                *
+                * Right now, we only allow for "near" copies.  When other
+                * formats are added, we will have to check those too.
+                *
+                * When checking "near" format, make sure no adjacent devices
+                * have failed beyond what can be handled.  In addition to the
+                * simple case where the number of devices is a multiple of the
+                * number of copies, we must also handle cases where the number
+                * of devices is not a multiple of the number of copies.
+                * E.g.    dev1 dev2 dev3 dev4 dev5
+                *          A    A    B    B    C
+                *          C    D    D    E    E
+                */
+               rebuilds_per_group = 0;
+               for (i = 0; i < rs->md.raid_disks * copies; i++) {
+                       d = i % rs->md.raid_disks;
+                       if (!test_bit(In_sync, &rs->dev[d].rdev.flags) &&
+                           (++rebuilds_per_group >= copies))
+                               goto too_many;
+                       if (!((i + 1) % copies))
+                               rebuilds_per_group = 0;
+               }
+               break;
        default:
                DMERR("The rebuild parameter is not supported for %s",
                      rs->raid_type->name);
@@ -507,7 +541,7 @@ static int parse_raid_params(struct raid_set *rs, char **argv,
 
                /* Parameters that take a numeric value are checked here */
                if (!strcasecmp(key, "rebuild")) {
-                       if (value > rs->md.raid_disks) {
+                       if (value >= rs->md.raid_disks) {
                                rs->ti->error = "Invalid rebuild index given";
                                return -EINVAL;
                        }
@@ -985,6 +1019,19 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm_target *ti, struct raid_set *rs)
 
        freshest = NULL;
        rdev_for_each_safe(rdev, tmp, mddev) {
+               /*
+                * Skipping super_load due to DMPF_SYNC will cause
+                * the array to undergo initialization again as
+                * though it were new.  This is the intended effect
+                * of the "sync" directive.
+                *
+                * When reshaping capability is added, we must ensure
+                * that the "sync" directive is disallowed during the
+                * reshape.
+                */
+               if (rs->print_flags & DMPF_SYNC)
+                       continue;
+
                if (!rdev->meta_bdev)
                        continue;
 
@@ -1385,7 +1432,7 @@ static void raid_resume(struct dm_target *ti)
 
 static struct target_type raid_target = {
        .name = "raid",
-       .version = {1, 3, 0},
+       .version = {1, 3, 1},
        .module = THIS_MODULE,
        .ctr = raid_ctr,
        .dtr = raid_dtr,