Josef Bacik [Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:38:49 +0000 (14:38 -0400)]
Btrfs: actually limit the size of delalloc range
So forever we have had this thing to limit the amount of delalloc pages we'll
setup to be written out to 128mb. This is because we have to lock all the pages
in this range, so anything above this gets a bit unweildly, and also without a
limit we'll happily allocate gigantic chunks of disk space. Turns out our check
for this wasn't quite right, we wouldn't actually limit the chunk we wanted to
write out, we'd just stop looking for more space after we went over the limit.
So if you do a giant 20gb dd on my box with lots of ram I could get 2gig
extents. This is fine normally, except when you go to relocate these extents
and we can't find enough space to relocate these moster extents, since we have
to be able to allocate exactly the same sized extent to move it around. So fix
this by actually enforcing the limit. With this patch I'm no longer seeing
giant 1.5gb extents. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: allocate the free space by the existed max extent size when ENOSPC
By the current code, if the requested size is very large, and all the extents
in the free space cache are small, we will waste lots of the cpu time to cut
the requested size in half and search the cache again and again until it gets
down to the size the allocator can return. In fact, we can know the max extent
size in the cache after the first search, so we needn't cut the size in half
repeatedly, and just use the max extent size directly. This way can save
lots of cpu time and make the performance grow up when there are only fragments
in the free space cache.
According to my test, if there are only 4KB free space extents in the fs,
and the total size of those extents are 256MB, we can reduce the execute
time of the following test from 5.4s to 1.4s.
dd if=/dev/zero of=<testfile> bs=1MB count=1 oflag=sync
Changelog v2 -> v3:
- fix the problem that we skip the block group with the space which is
less than we need.
Changelog v1 -> v2:
- address the problem that we return a wrong start position when searching
the free space in a bitmap.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:25:27 +0000 (15:25 +0200)]
btrfs: show compiled-in config features at module load time
We want to know if there are debugging features compiled in, this may
affect performance. The message is printed before the sanity checks.
(This commit message is a copy of David Sterba's commit message when
he introduced btrfs_print_info()).
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: more efficient inode tree replace operation
Instead of removing the current inode from the red black tree
and then add the new one, just use the red black tree replace
operation, which is more efficient.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: do not add replace target to the alloc_list
If replace was suspended by the umount, replace target device is added
to the fs_devices->alloc_list during a later mount. This is obviously
wrong. ->is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace is supposed to guard against that,
but ->is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace is (and can only ever be) initialized
*after* everything is opened and fs_devices lists are populated. Fix
this by checking the devid instead: for replace targets it's always
equal to BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID.
Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Fri, 30 Aug 2013 19:09:51 +0000 (15:09 -0400)]
Btrfs: fixup error handling in btrfs_reloc_cow
If we failed to actually allocate the correct size of the extent to relocate we
will end up in an infinite loop because we won't return an error, we'll just
move on to the next extent. So fix this up by returning an error, and then fix
all the callers to return an error up the stack rather than BUG_ON()'ing.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi
Pull SCSI fix from James Bottomley:
"This is a bug fix for the pm80xx driver. It turns out that when the
new hardware support was added in 3.10 the IO command size was kept at
the old hard coded value. This means that the driver attaches to some
new cards and then simply hangs the system"
* tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi:
[SCSI] pm80xx: fix Adaptec 71605H hang
Merge branch 'x86-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 boot fix from Peter Anvin:
"A single very small boot fix for very large memory systems (> 0.5T)"
* 'x86-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/mm: Fix boot crash with DEBUG_PAGE_ALLOC=y and more than 512G RAM
When the binary search returns 0 (exact match), the target key
will necessarily be at slot 0 of all nodes below the current one,
so in this case the binary search is not needed because it will
always return 0, and we waste time doing it, holding node locks
for longer than necessary, etc.
Below follow histograms with the times spent on the current approach of
doing a binary search when the previous binary search returned 0, and
times for the new approach, which directly picks the first item/child
node in the leaf/node.
These samples were captured during a run of the btrfs tests 001, 002 and
004 in the xfstests, with a leaf/node size of 4Kb.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:51:22 +0000 (16:51 -0400)]
Btrfs: don't use an async starter for most of our workers
We only need an async starter if we can't make a GFP_NOFS allocation in our
current path. This is the case for the endio stuff since it happens in IRQ
context, but things like the caching thread workers and the delalloc flushers we
can easily make this allocation and start threads right away. Also change the
worker count for the caching thread pool. Traditionally we limited this to 2
since we took read locks while caching, but nowadays we do this lockless so
there's no reason to limit the number of caching threads. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:43:28 +0000 (16:43 -0400)]
Btrfs: only update disk_i_size as we remove extents
This fixes a problem where if we fail a truncate we will leave the i_size set
where we wanted to truncate to instead of where we were able to truncate to.
Fix this by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items do the disk_i_size update as it
removes extents, that way it will always be consistent with where its extents
are. Then if the truncate fails at all we can update the in-ram i_size with
what we have on disk and delete the orphan item. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If there's an ongoing transaction when the uuid scan kthread attempts
to create one, the kthread will block, waiting for that transaction to
finish while it's keeping locks on the tree root, and in turn the existing
transaction is waiting for those locks to be free.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Ilya Dryomov [Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:50:44 +0000 (13:50 +0300)]
Btrfs: stop refusing the relocation of chunk 0
AFAICT chunk 0 is no longer special, and so it should be restriped just
like every other chunk. One reason for this change is us refusing the
relocation can lead to filesystems that can only be mounted ro, and
never rw -- see the bugzilla [1] for details. The other reason is that
device removal code is already doing this: it will happily relocate
chunk 0 is part of shrinking the device.
Btrfs: fix memory leak of uuid_root in free_fs_info
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Andy Shevchenko [Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:32:13 +0000 (10:32 +0300)]
btrfs: reuse kbasename helper
To get name of the file from a pathname let's use kbasename() helper. It allows
to simplify code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Anand Jain [Wed, 21 Aug 2013 03:44:48 +0000 (11:44 +0800)]
btrfs: return btrfs error code for dev excl ops err
now threads can return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_EXCL_RUN_IN_PROGRESS
as defined in btrfs.h for the dev excl operation error in
the FS, which means with this kernel would stop logging
(almost an user error) into the /var/log/messages
v2: accepts Josef' comment
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:57:21 +0000 (13:57 -0400)]
Btrfs: allow partial ordered extent completion
We currently have this problem where you can truncate pages that have not yet
been written for an ordered extent. We do this because the truncate will be
coming behind to clean us up anyway so what's the harm right? Well if truncate
fails for whatever reason we leave an orphan item around for the file to be
cleaned up later. But if the user goes and truncates up the file and tries to
read from the area that had been discarded previously they will get a csum error
because we never actually wrote that data out.
This patch fixes this by allowing us to either discard the ordered extent
completely, by which I mean we just free up the space we had allocated and not
add the file extent, or adjust the length of the file extent we write. We do
this by setting the length we truncated down to in the ordered extent, and then
we set the file extent length and ram bytes to this length. The total disk
space stays unchanged since we may be compressed and we can't just chop off the
disk space, but at least this way the file extent only points to the valid data.
Then when the file extent is free'd the extent and csums will be freed normally.
This patch is needed for the next series which will give us more graceful
recovery of failed truncates. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 26 Aug 2013 20:53:15 +0000 (16:53 -0400)]
Btrfs: add support for asserts
One of the complaints we get a lot is how many BUG_ON()'s we have. So to help
with this I'm introducing a kconfig option to enable/disable a new ASSERT()
mechanism much like what XFS does. This will allow us developers to still get
our nice panics but allow users/distros to compile them out. With this we can
go through and convert any BUG_ON()'s that we have to catch actual programming
mistakes to the new ASSERT() and then fix everybody else to return errors. This
will also allow developers to leave sanity checks in their new code to make sure
we don't trip over problems while testing stuff and vetting new features.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 26 Aug 2013 17:45:53 +0000 (13:45 -0400)]
Btrfs: adjust the fs_devices->missing count on unmount
I noticed that if I tried to mount a file system with -o degraded after having
done it once already we would fail to mount. This is because the
fs_devices->missing count was getting bumped everytime we mounted, but not
getting reset whenever we unmounted. To fix this we just drop the missing count
as we're closing devices to make sure this doesn't happen. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:34:43 +0000 (10:34 +0200)]
Btrf: cleanup: don't check for root_refs == 0 twice
btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() already checks if btrfs_root_refs()
is zero and returns ENOENT in this case. There is no need to do
it again in three more places.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:34:42 +0000 (10:34 +0200)]
Btrfs: fix for patch "cleanup: don't check the same thing twice"
Mitch Harder noticed that the patch 3c64a1a mentioned in the subject
line was causing a kernel BUG() on snapshot deletion.
The patch was wrong. It did not handle cached roots correctly. The
check for root_refs == 0 was removed everywhere where
btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() had been used to retrieve the root,
because this check was already dealt with in
btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name(). But in the case when the root was
found in the cache, there was no such check.
This patch adds the missing check in the case where the root is
found in the cache.
Reported-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Fri, 9 Aug 2013 15:08:40 +0000 (17:08 +0200)]
Btrfs: get rid of one BUG() in write_all_supers()
The second round uses btrfs_error() and return -EIO, the first round
can handle write errors the same way.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong [Fri, 9 Aug 2013 05:25:36 +0000 (13:25 +0800)]
Btrfs: allocate prelim_ref with a slab allocater
struct __prelim_ref is allocated and freed frequently when
walking backref tree, using slab allocater can not only
speed up allocating but also detect memory leaks.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong [Tue, 6 Aug 2013 02:29:54 +0000 (10:29 +0800)]
Btrfs: pass gfp_t to __add_prelim_ref() to avoid always using GFP_ATOMIC
Currently, only add_delayed_refs have to allocate with GFP_ATOMIC,
So just pass arg 'gfp_t' to decide which allocation mode.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: fix race conditions in BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO ioctl
The handler for the ioctl BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO was reading the
number of devices before acquiring the device list mutex.
This could lead to inconsistent results because the update of
the device list and the number of devices counter (amongst other
counters related to the device list) are updated in volumes.c
while holding the device list mutex - except for 2 places, one
was volumes.c:btrfs_prepare_sprout() and the other was
volumes.c:device_list_add().
For example, if we have 2 devices, with IDs 1 and 2 and then add
a new device, with ID 3, and while adding the device is in progress
an BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO ioctl arrives, it could return a number of
devices of 2 and a max dev id of 3. This would be incorrect.
Also, this ioctl handler was reading the fsid while it can be
updated concurrently. This can happen when while a new device is
being added and the current filesystem is in seeding mode.
Example:
If during the last step a BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO ioctl was requested, it
could read an fsid that was never valid (some bits part of the old
fsid and others part of the new fsid). Also, it could read a number
of devices that doesn't match the number of devices in the list and
the max device id, as explained before.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: fix race between removing a dev and writing sbs
This change fixes an issue when removing a device and writing
all super blocks run simultaneously. Here's the steps necessary
for the issue to happen:
1) disk-io.c:write_all_supers() gets a number of N devices from the
super_copy, so it will not panic if it fails to write super blocks
for N - 1 devices;
2) Then it tries to acquire the device_list_mutex, but blocks because
volumes.c:btrfs_rm_device() got it first;
3) btrfs_rm_device() removes the device from the list, then unlocks the
mutex and after the unlock it updates the number of devices in
super_copy to N - 1.
4) write_all_supers() finally acquires the mutex, iterates over all the
devices in the list and gets N - 1 errors, that is, it failed to write
super blocks to all the devices;
5) Because write_all_supers() thinks there are a total of N devices, it
considers N - 1 errors to be ok, and therefore won't panic.
So this change just makes sure that write_all_supers() reads the number
of devices from super_copy after it acquires the device_list_mutex.
Conversely, it changes btrfs_rm_device() to update the number of devices
in super_copy before it releases the device list mutex.
The code path to add a new device (volumes.c:btrfs_init_new_device),
already has the right behaviour: it updates the number of devices in
super_copy while holding the device_list_mutex.
The only code path that doesn't lock the device list mutex
before updating the number of devices in the super copy is
disk-io.c:next_root_backup(), called by open_ctree() during
mount time where concurrency issues can't happen.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:03:29 +0000 (17:03 -0400)]
Btrfs: remove ourselves from the cluster list under lock
A user was reporting weird warnings from btrfs_put_delayed_ref() and I noticed
that we were doing this list_del_init() on our head ref outside of
delayed_refs->lock. This is a problem if we have people still on the list, we
could end up modifying old pointers and such. Fix this by removing us from the
list before we do our run_delayed_ref on our head ref. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:54:00 +0000 (15:54 -0400)]
Btrfs: do not clear our orphan item runtime flag on eexist
We were unconditionally clearing our runtime flag on the inode on error when
trying to insert an orphan item. This is wrong in the case of -EEXIST since we
obviously have an orphan item. This was causing us to not do the correct
cleanup of our orphan items which caused issues on cleanup. This happens
because currently when truncate fails we just leave the orphan item on there so
it can be cleaned up, so if we go to remove the file later we will hit this
issue. What we do for truncate isn't right either, but we shouldn't screw this
sort of thing up on error either, so fix this and then I'll fix truncate in a
different patch. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:55:39 +0000 (15:55 -0400)]
Btrfs: fix send to deal with sparse files properly
Send was just sending everything it found, even if the extent was a hole. This
is unpleasant for users, so just skip holes when we are sending. This will also
skip sending prealloc extents since the send spec doesn't have a prealloc
command. Eventually we will add a prealloc command and rev the send version so
we can send down the prealloc info. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The name buffer is not terminated by a '\0' character,
therefore it needs to be printed with %.*s and use the
length of the buffer.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: Do not truncate sector_t on 32-bit with CONFIG_LBDAF=y
sector_t may be either "u64" (always 64 bit) or "unsigned long" (32 or 64
bit). Casting it to "unsigned long" will truncate it on 32-bit platforms
where CONFIG_LBDAF=y.
Cast to "unsigned long long" and format using "ll" instead.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: Make btrfs_dev_extent_chunk_tree_uuid() return unsigned long
Internally, btrfs_dev_extent_chunk_tree_uuid() calculates an unsigned long,
but casts it to a pointer, while all callers cast it to unsigned long
again.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: Make BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID an unsigned long long constant
The internal btrfs device id is a u64, hence make the constant
BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID "unsigned long long" as well, so we no longer need
a cast to print it.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Ilya Dryomov [Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:33:04 +0000 (14:33 +0300)]
Btrfs: rollback btrfs_device fields on umount
It turns out we don't properly rollback in-core btrfs_device state on
umount. We zero out ->bdev, ->in_fs_metadata and that's about it. In
particular, we don't zero out ->generation, and this can lead to us
refusing a mount -- a non-NULL fs_devices->latest_bdev is essential, but
btrfs_close_extra_devices will happily assign NULL to ->latest_bdev if
the first device on the dev_list happens to be missing and consequently
has no bdev attached. This happens because since commit a6b0d5c8
btrfs_close_extra_devices adjusts ->latest_bdev, and in doing that,
relies on the ->generation. Fix this, and possibly other problems, by
zeroing out everything except for what device_list_add sets, so that a
mount right after insmod and 'btrfs dev scan' is no different from any
later mount in this respect.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Ilya Dryomov [Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:20:17 +0000 (13:20 +0300)]
Btrfs: add btrfs_alloc_device and switch to it
Currently btrfs_device is allocated ad-hoc in a few different places,
and as a result not all fields are initialized properly. In particular,
readahead state is only initialized in device_list_add (at scan time),
and not in btrfs_init_new_device (when the new device is added with
'btrfs dev add'). Fix this by adding an allocation helper and switch
everybody but __btrfs_close_devices to it. (__btrfs_close_devices is
dealt with in a later commit.)
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:51:13 +0000 (18:51 +0200)]
Btrfs: don't allow the replace procedure on read only filesystems
If you start the replace procedure on a read only filesystem, at
the end the procedure fails to write the updated dev_items to the
chunk tree. The problem is that this error is not indicated except
for a WARN_ON(). If the user now thinks that everything was done
as expected and destroys the source device (with mkfs or with a
hammer). The next mount fails with "failed to read chunk root" and
the filesystem is gone.
This commit adds code to fail the attempt to start the replace
procedure if the filesystem is mounted read-only.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Mike Frysinger [Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:02:33 +0000 (14:02 -0400)]
Btrfs: use __u64 in exported user headers
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: reset force_compress on btrfs_file_defrag failure
After we set force_compress with a new value (which was not being done
while holding the inode mutex), if an error happens and we jump to
the label out_ra, the force_compress property of the inode is not set
to BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE (unlike in the case where no errors happen).
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:11:24 +0000 (17:11 +0200)]
Btrfs: add mount option to force UUID tree checking
This should never be needed, but since all functions are there
to check and rebuild the UUID tree, a mount option is added that
allows to force this check and rebuild procedure.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:11:23 +0000 (17:11 +0200)]
Btrfs: check UUID tree during mount if required
If the filesystem was mounted with an old kernel that was not
aware of the UUID tree, this is detected by looking at the
uuid_tree_generation field of the superblock (similar to how
the free space cache is doing it). If a mismatch is detected
at mount time, a thread is started that does two things:
1. Iterate through the UUID tree, check each entry, delete those
entries that are not valid anymore (i.e., the subvol does not
exist anymore or the value changed).
2. Iterate through the root tree, for each found subvolume, add
the UUID tree entries for the subvolume (if they are not
already there).
This mechanism is also used to handle and repair errors that
happened during the initial creation and filling of the tree.
The update of the uuid_tree_generation field (which indicates
that the state of the UUID tree is up to date) is blocked until
all create and repair operations are successfully completed.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:11:22 +0000 (17:11 +0200)]
Btrfs: introduce uuid-tree-gen field
In order to be able to detect the case that a filesystem is mounted
with an old kernel, add a uuid-tree-gen field like the free space
cache is doing it. It is part of the super block and written with
each commit. Old kernels do not know this field and don't update it.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:11:21 +0000 (17:11 +0200)]
Btrfs: fill UUID tree initially
When the UUID tree is initially created, a task is spawned that
walks through the root tree. For each found subvolume root_item,
the uuid and received_uuid entries in the UUID tree are added.
This is such a quick operation so that in case somebody wants
to unmount the filesystem while the task is still running, the
unmount is delayed until the UUID tree building task is finished.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:11:20 +0000 (17:11 +0200)]
Btrfs: maintain subvolume items in the UUID tree
When a new subvolume or snapshot is created, a new UUID item is added
to the UUID tree. Such items are removed when the subvolume is deleted.
The ioctl to set the received subvolume UUID is also touched and will
now also add this received UUID into the UUID tree together with the
ID of the subvolume. The latter is also done when read-only snapshots
are created which inherit all the send/receive information from the
parent subvolume.
User mode programs use the BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH ioctl to search and
read in the UUID tree.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:11:19 +0000 (17:11 +0200)]
Btrfs: create UUID tree if required
This tree is not created by mkfs.btrfs. Therefore when a filesystem
is mounted writable and the UUID tree does not exist, this tree is
created if required. The tree is also added to the fs_info structure
and initialized, but this commit does not yet read or write UUID tree
elements.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:11:18 +0000 (17:11 +0200)]
Btrfs: support printing UUID tree elements
This commit adds support to print UUID tree elements to print-tree.c.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:11:17 +0000 (17:11 +0200)]
Btrfs: introduce a tree for items that map UUIDs to something
Mapping UUIDs to subvolume IDs is an operation with a high effort
today. Today, the algorithm even has quadratic effort (based on the
number of existing subvolumes), which means, that it takes minutes
to send/receive a single subvolume if 10,000 subvolumes exist. But
even linear effort would be too much since it is a waste. And these
data structures to allow mapping UUIDs to subvolume IDs are created
every time a btrfs send/receive instance is started.
It is much more efficient to maintain a searchable persistent data
structure in the filesystem, one that is updated whenever a
subvolume/snapshot is created and deleted, and when the received
subvolume UUID is set by the btrfs-receive tool.
Therefore kernel code is added with this commit that is able to
maintain data structures in the filesystem that allow to quickly
search for a given UUID and to retrieve data that is assigned to
this UUID, like which subvolume ID is related to this UUID.
This commit adds a new tree to hold UUID-to-data mapping items. The
key of the items is the full UUID plus the key type BTRFS_UUID_KEY.
Multiple data blocks can be stored for a given UUID, a type/length/
value scheme is used.
Now follows the lengthy justification, why a new tree was added
instead of using the existing root tree:
The first approach was to not create another tree that holds UUID
items. Instead, the items should just go into the top root tree.
Unfortunately this confused the algorithm to assign the objectid
of subvolumes and snapshots. The reason is that
btrfs_find_free_objectid() calls btrfs_find_highest_objectid() for
the first created subvol or snapshot after mounting a filesystem,
and this function simply searches for the largest used objectid in
the root tree keys to pick the next objectid to assign. Of course,
the UUID keys have always been the ones with the highest offset
value, and the next assigned subvol ID was wastefully huge.
To use any other existing tree did not look proper. To apply a
workaround such as setting the objectid to zero in the UUID item
key and to implement collision handling would either add
limitations (in case of a btrfs_extend_item() approach to handle
the collisions) or a lot of complexity and source code (in case a
key would be looked up that is free of collisions). Adding new code
that introduces limitations is not good, and adding code that is
complex and lengthy for no good reason is also not good. That's the
justification why a completely new tree was introduced.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Stefan Behrens [Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:12:25 +0000 (18:12 +0200)]
Btrfs: get rid of sparse warnings
make C=2 fs/btrfs/ CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
I tried to filter out the warnings for which patches have already
been sent to the mailing list, pending for inclusion in btrfs-next.
All these changes should be obviously safe.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: don't miss inode ref items in BTRFS_IOC_INO_LOOKUP
If the inode ref key was not found and the current leaf slot
was 0 (first item in the leaf) the code would always return
-ENOENT. This was not correct because the desired inode ref
item might be the last item in the previous leaf.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: add missing error code to BTRFS_IOC_INO_LOOKUP handler
If the path doesn't fit in the input buffer, return ENAMETOOLONG
instead of returning with a success code (0) and a partially
filled and right justified buffer.
Also removed useless buffer pointer check outside the while loop.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong [Wed, 14 Aug 2013 01:13:38 +0000 (09:13 +0800)]
Btrfs: remove reduplicate check when disabling quota
We have checked 'quota_root' with qgroup_ioctl_lock held before,So
here the check is reduplicate, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong [Wed, 14 Aug 2013 01:13:37 +0000 (09:13 +0800)]
Btrfs: move btrfs_free_qgroup_config() out of spin_lock and fix comments
btrfs_free_qgroup_config() is not only called by open/close_ctree(),but
also btrfs_disable_quota().And for btrfs_disable_quota(),we have set
'quota_root' to be null before calling btrfs_free_qgroup_config(),so it
is safe to cleanup in-memory structures without lock held.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong [Wed, 14 Aug 2013 01:13:36 +0000 (09:13 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix oops when writing dirty qgroups to disk
When disabling quota, we should clear out list 'dirty_qgroups',otherwise,
we will get oops if enabling quota again. Fix this by abstracting similar
code from del_qgroup_rb().
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:52:55 +0000 (16:52 -0400)]
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse
If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the
trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way
we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are
not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has
been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and
check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do
anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the
name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then
remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as
the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will
assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive.
In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really
is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the
items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra
checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up
the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the
generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory
and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs
list.
This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup
when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking
for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the
case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send
volume to compare with.
There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we
needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same
inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So
instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then
process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether.
Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving
directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all
of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:05:12 +0000 (15:05 -0400)]
Btrfs: separate out tests into their own directory
The plan is to have a bunch of unit tests that run when btrfs is loaded when you
build with the appropriate config option. My ultimate goal is to have a test
for every non-static function we have, but at first I'm going to focus on the
things that cause us the most problems. To start out with this just adds a
tests/ directory and moves the existing free space cache tests into that
directory and sets up all of the infrastructure. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:02:47 +0000 (14:02 -0400)]
Btrfs: avoid starting a transaction in the write path
I noticed while looking at a deadlock that we are always starting a transaction
in cow_file_range(). This isn't really needed since we only need a transaction
if we are doing an inline extent, or if the allocator needs to allocate a chunk.
So push down all the transaction start stuff to be closer to where we actually
need a transaction in all of these cases. This will hopefully reduce our write
latency when we are committing often. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:33:56 +0000 (11:33 -0400)]
Btrfs: fix heavy delalloc related deadlock
I added a patch where we started taking the ordered operations mutex when we
waited on ordered extents. We need this because we splice the list and process
it, so if a flusher came in during this scenario it would think the list was
empty and we'd usually get an early ENOSPC. The problem with this is that this
lock is used in transaction committing. So we end up with something like this
Transaction commit
-> wait on writers
Delalloc flusher
-> run_ordered_operations (holds mutex)
->wait for filemap-flush to do its thing
flush task
-> cow_file_range
->wait on btrfs_join_transaction because we're commiting
some other task
-> commit_transaction because we notice trans->transaction->flush is set
-> run_ordered_operations (hang on mutex)
We need to disentangle the ordered operations flushing from the delalloc
flushing, since they are separate things. This solves the deadlock issue I was
seeing. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:10:08 +0000 (14:10 -0400)]
Btrfs: fix the error handling wrt orphan items
There are several places where we BUG_ON() if we fail to remove the orphan items
and such, which is not ok, so remove those and either abort or just carry on.
This also fixes a problem where if we couldn't start a transaction we wouldn't
actually remove the orphan item reserve for the inode. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 12 Aug 2013 19:36:44 +0000 (15:36 -0400)]
Btrfs: don't allow a subvol to be deleted if it is the default subovl
Eric pointed out that btrfs will happily allow you to delete the default subvol.
This is a problem obviously since the next time you go to mount the file system
it will freak out because it can't find the root. Fix this by adding a check to
see if our default subvol points to the subvol we are trying to delete, and if
it does not allowing it to happen. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:56:14 +0000 (10:56 -0400)]
Btrfs: skip subvol entries when checking if we've created a dir already
We have logic to see if we've already created a parent directory by check to see
if an inode inside of that directory has a lower inode number than the one we
are currently processing. The logic is that if there is a lower inode number
then we would have had to made sure the directory was created at that previous
point. The problem is that subvols inode numbers count from the lowest objectid
in the root tree, which may be less than our current progress. So just skip if
our dir item key is a root item. This fixes the original test and the xfstest
version I made that added an extra subvol create. Thanks,
Reported-by: Emil Karlson <jekarlson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Mark Fasheh [Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:42:51 +0000 (11:42 -0700)]
btrfs: offline dedupe
This patch adds an ioctl, BTRFS_IOC_FILE_EXTENT_SAME which will try to
de-duplicate a list of extents across a range of files.
Internally, the ioctl re-uses code from the clone ioctl. This avoids
rewriting a large chunk of extent handling code.
Userspace passes in an array of file, offset pairs along with a length
argument. The ioctl will then (for each dedupe) do a byte-by-byte comparison
of the user data before deduping the extent. Status and number of bytes
deduped are returned for each operation.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Mark Fasheh [Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:42:50 +0000 (11:42 -0700)]
btrfs: Introduce extent_read_full_page_nolock()
We want this for btrfs_extent_same. Basically readpage and friends do their
own extent locking but for the purposes of dedupe, we want to have both
files locked down across a set of readpage operations (so that we can
compare data). Introduce this variant and a flag which can be set for
extent_read_full_page() to indicate that we are already locked.
Partial credit for this patch goes to Gabriel de Perthuis <g2p.code@gmail.com>
as I have included a fix from him to the original patch which avoids a
deadlock on compressed extents.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Mark Fasheh [Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:42:49 +0000 (11:42 -0700)]
btrfs_ioctl_clone: Move clone code into it's own function
There's some 250+ lines here that are easily encapsulated into their own
function. I don't change how anything works here, just create and document
the new btrfs_clone() function from btrfs_ioctl_clone() code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Mark Fasheh [Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:42:48 +0000 (11:42 -0700)]
btrfs: abtract out range locking in clone ioctl()
The range locking in btrfs_ioctl_clone is trivially broken out into it's own
function. This reduces the complexity of btrfs_ioctl_clone() by a small bit
and makes that locking code available to future functions in
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
In extent-tree.c:do_chunk_alloc(), early on we returned 0 (success)
when the target space was full and when chunk allocation is needed.
However, later on in that same function we return ENOSPC if
btrfs_alloc_chunk() fails (and chunk allocation was needed) and
set the space's full flag.
This was inconsistent, as -ENOSPC should be returned if the space
is full and a chunk allocation needs to performed. If the space is
full but no chunk allocation is needed, just return 0 (success).
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: don't ignore errors from btrfs_run_delayed_items
tree-log.c was ignoring the return value from btrfs_run_delayed_items()
in several places.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: fix inode leak on kmalloc failure in tree-log.c
In tree-log.c:replay_one_name(), if memory allocation for
the name fails, ensure we iput the dir inode we got before
before we return.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Liu Bo [Fri, 2 Aug 2013 08:30:40 +0000 (16:30 +0800)]
Btrfs: allow compressed extents to be merged during defragment
The rule originally comes from nocow writing, but snapshot-aware
defrag is a different case, the extent has been writen and we're
not going to change the extent but add a reference on the data.
So we're able to allow such compressed extents to be merged into
one bigger extent if they're pointing to the same data.
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
David Sterba [Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:14:52 +0000 (18:14 +0200)]
btrfs: add mount option to set commit interval
I'ts hardcoded to 30 seconds which is fine for most users. Higher values
defer data being synced to permanent storage with obvious consequences
when the system crashes. The upper bound is not forced, but a warning is
printed if it's more than 300 seconds (5 minutes).
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Wed, 7 Aug 2013 18:54:37 +0000 (14:54 -0400)]
Btrfs: deal with enomem in the rewind path
We can get ENOMEM trying to allocate dummy bufs for the rewind operation of the
tree mod log. Instead of BUG_ON()'ing in this case pass up ENOMEM. I looked
back through the callers and I'm pretty sure I got everybody who did BUG_ON(ret)
in this path. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 6 Aug 2013 20:47:48 +0000 (16:47 -0400)]
Btrfs: check our parent dir when doing a compare send
When doing a send with a parent subvol we will check to see if the file we are
acting on is being overwritten and move it if we think it may be needed further
down the line during the send. We check this by checking its directory and
making sure it existed in the parent and making sure the file existed in the
parent. The problem with this check is that if we create a directory and a file
in that directory, and then snapshot, and then remove and re-create that same
directory and file with different inode numbers and then try to snapshot and
send with the original parent we will try and save the original file inside of
that directory. This is a problem because during the receive we move the
directory out of the way because it is a completely new inode, which makes us
unable to find the old file inside of the directory when we try to move that out
of the way for the overwrite. We fix this by checking the parent directory of
the inode we think we are overwriting. If the parent directory generation in
the send root != the parent directory generation in the parent root then we know
it is a completely new directory and we need not bother with moving the file out
of the way because it would have been completely destroyed. This fixes bz
60673. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:15:21 +0000 (11:15 -0400)]
Btrfs: handle errors when doing slow caching
Alex Lyakas reported a bug where wait_block_group_cache_progress() would wait
forever if a drive failed. This is because we just bail out if there is an
error while trying to cache a block group, we don't update anybody who may be
waiting. So this introduces a new enum for the cache state in case of error and
makes everybody bail out if we have an error. Alex tested and verified this
patch fixed his problem. This fixes bz 59431. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: add missing error handling to read_tree_block
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: add missing error check to find_parent_nodes
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
After reading all device items from the chunk tree, don't
exit the loop and then navigate down the tree again to find
the chunk items. Instead just read all device items and
chunk items with a single tree search. This is possible
because all device items are found before any chunk item in
the chunks tree.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:30:30 +0000 (16:30 -0400)]
Btrfs: change how we queue blocks for backref checking
Previously we only added blocks to the list to have their backrefs checked if
the level of the block is right above the one we are searching for. This is
because we want to make sure we don't add the entire path up to the root to the
lists to make sure we process things one at a time. This assumes that if any
blocks in the path to the root are going to be not checked (shared in other
words) then they will be in the level right above the current block on up. This
isn't quite right though since we can have blocks higher up the list that are
shared because they are attached to a reloc root. But we won't add this block
to be checked and then later on we will BUG_ON(!upper->checked). So instead
keep track of wether or not we've queued a block to be checked in this current
search, and if we haven't go ahead and queue it to be checked. This patch fixed
the panic I was seeing where we BUG_ON(!upper->checked). Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:44:09 +0000 (15:44 -0400)]
Btrfs: check to see if we have an inline item properly
If our item isn't big enough to have an actual inline item when we have skinny
metadata enabled just return 1 in find_inline_backref so we can move on to the
next item. This probably wasn't causing a problem since we check the values of
ptr and end properly, but just in case this will keep us from doing extra work.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:22:24 +0000 (13:22 -0400)]
Btrfs: fix what bits we clear when erroring out from delalloc
First of all we no longer set EXTENT_DIRTY when we dirty an extent so this patch
removes the clearing of EXTENT_DIRTY since it confuses me. This patch also adds
clearing EXTENT_DEFRAG and also doing EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING when we have errors.
This is because if we are clearing delalloc without adding an ordered extent
then we need to make sure the enospc handling stuff is accounted for. Also if
this range was DEFRAG we need to make sure that bit is cleared so we dont leak
it. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Josef Bacik [Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:20:47 +0000 (11:20 -0400)]
Btrfs: cleanup arguments to extent_clear_unlock_delalloc
This patch removes the io_tree argument for extent_clear_unlock_delalloc since
we always use &BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, and it separates out the extent tree
operations from the page operations. This way we just pass in the extent bits
we want to clear and then pass in the operations we want done to the pages.
This is because I'm going to fix what extent bits we clear in some cases and
rather than add a bunch of new flags we'll just use the actual extent bits we
want to clear. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
projects / karo-tx-linux.git / log