]> git.kernelconcepts.de Git - karo-tx-linux.git/commitdiff
dm cache: fix a lock-inversion
authorJoe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Thu, 3 Apr 2014 15:16:44 +0000 (16:16 +0100)
committerMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Fri, 4 Apr 2014 18:53:05 +0000 (14:53 -0400)
When suspending a cache the policy is walked and the individual policy
hints written to the metadata via sync_metadata().  This led to this
lock order:

      policy->lock
        cache_metadata->root_lock

When loading the cache target the policy is populated while the metadata
lock is held:

      cache_metadata->root_lock
         policy->lock

Fix this potential lock-inversion (ABBA) deadlock in sync_metadata() by
ensuring the cache_metadata root_lock is held whilst all the hints are
written, rather than being repeatedly locked while policy->lock is held
(as was the case with each callout that policy_walk_mappings() made to
the old save_hint() method).

Found by turning on the CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING ("Lock debugging: prove
locking correctness") build option.  However, it is not clear how the
LOCKDEP reported paths can lead to a deadlock since the two paths,
suspending a target and loading a target, never occur at the same time.
But that doesn't mean the same lock-inversion couldn't have occurred
elsewhere.

Reported-by: Marian Csontos <mcsontos@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
drivers/md/dm-cache-metadata.c
drivers/md/dm-cache-metadata.h
drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c

index 66f102ab102c4ddb6e3624bc21b458f1cd645362..4ead4ba606562b0c33d750064660a4effe0594ea 100644 (file)
@@ -1245,22 +1245,12 @@ static int begin_hints(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, struct dm_cache_policy *po
        return 0;
 }
 
-int dm_cache_begin_hints(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, struct dm_cache_policy *policy)
+static int save_hint(void *context, dm_cblock_t cblock, dm_oblock_t oblock, uint32_t hint)
 {
+       struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd = context;
+       __le32 value = cpu_to_le32(hint);
        int r;
 
-       down_write(&cmd->root_lock);
-       r = begin_hints(cmd, policy);
-       up_write(&cmd->root_lock);
-
-       return r;
-}
-
-static int save_hint(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, dm_cblock_t cblock,
-                    uint32_t hint)
-{
-       int r;
-       __le32 value = cpu_to_le32(hint);
        __dm_bless_for_disk(&value);
 
        r = dm_array_set_value(&cmd->hint_info, cmd->hint_root,
@@ -1270,16 +1260,25 @@ static int save_hint(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, dm_cblock_t cblock,
        return r;
 }
 
-int dm_cache_save_hint(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, dm_cblock_t cblock,
-                      uint32_t hint)
+static int write_hints(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, struct dm_cache_policy *policy)
 {
        int r;
 
-       if (!hints_array_initialized(cmd))
-               return 0;
+       r = begin_hints(cmd, policy);
+       if (r) {
+               DMERR("begin_hints failed");
+               return r;
+       }
+
+       return policy_walk_mappings(policy, save_hint, cmd);
+}
+
+int dm_cache_write_hints(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, struct dm_cache_policy *policy)
+{
+       int r;
 
        down_write(&cmd->root_lock);
-       r = save_hint(cmd, cblock, hint);
+       r = write_hints(cmd, policy);
        up_write(&cmd->root_lock);
 
        return r;
index ce8468bb616e5f8ac7356bb2fa8056592e951dd3..cd70a78623a336956a6366a4de1b2a912821dd9a 100644 (file)
@@ -128,14 +128,7 @@ void dm_cache_dump(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd);
  * rather than querying the policy for each cblock, we let it walk its data
  * structures and fill in the hints in whatever order it wishes.
  */
-
-int dm_cache_begin_hints(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, struct dm_cache_policy *p);
-
-/*
- * requests hints for every cblock and stores in the metadata device.
- */
-int dm_cache_save_hint(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd,
-                      dm_cblock_t cblock, uint32_t hint);
+int dm_cache_write_hints(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd, struct dm_cache_policy *p);
 
 /*
  * Query method.  Are all the blocks in the cache clean?
index 8534679918f41c01efc47293516b4158f52d61af..1bf4a71919ec73957a00550dec49b3a3b3a1292c 100644 (file)
@@ -2582,30 +2582,6 @@ static int write_discard_bitset(struct cache *cache)
        return 0;
 }
 
-static int save_hint(void *context, dm_cblock_t cblock, dm_oblock_t oblock,
-                    uint32_t hint)
-{
-       struct cache *cache = context;
-       return dm_cache_save_hint(cache->cmd, cblock, hint);
-}
-
-static int write_hints(struct cache *cache)
-{
-       int r;
-
-       r = dm_cache_begin_hints(cache->cmd, cache->policy);
-       if (r) {
-               DMERR("dm_cache_begin_hints failed");
-               return r;
-       }
-
-       r = policy_walk_mappings(cache->policy, save_hint, cache);
-       if (r)
-               DMERR("policy_walk_mappings failed");
-
-       return r;
-}
-
 /*
  * returns true on success
  */
@@ -2623,7 +2599,7 @@ static bool sync_metadata(struct cache *cache)
 
        save_stats(cache);
 
-       r3 = write_hints(cache);
+       r3 = dm_cache_write_hints(cache->cmd, cache->policy);
        if (r3)
                DMERR("could not write hints");
 
@@ -3094,7 +3070,7 @@ static void cache_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
 
 static struct target_type cache_target = {
        .name = "cache",
-       .version = {1, 3, 0},
+       .version = {1, 4, 0},
        .module = THIS_MODULE,
        .ctr = cache_ctr,
        .dtr = cache_dtr,